How can the British Government remain opposed to the death penalty if Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett considers that Saddam Hussein's execution means that he has finally been "held to account" for his crimes?
Does Margaret Beckett think that Ian Huntley and Peter Sutcliffe have been "held to account" for their crimes?
If the Government accepts Iraq's sovereignty to convict and execute Saddam Hussein, why didn't they accept Pakistan's sovereignty to convict and execute Mirza Tahir Hussain!?!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment