It's worse than that. For years Nulab have been yapping on about wanting to spend as much per pupil in the state sector as in the private sector. It is now quite clearly the case that the total cost (including quangos) per state pupil is = the school fees of better value/cheaper private schools.
But Mark, when was education ever Labour's priority? They would have scrapped Comprehensives and reintroduced Grammar Schools if they had wanted results.
Spending is only a priority for keeping union brothers and sisters off unemployment benefits!
2 comments:
It's worse than that. For years Nulab have been yapping on about wanting to spend as much per pupil in the state sector as in the private sector. It is now quite clearly the case that the total cost (including quangos) per state pupil is = the school fees of better value/cheaper private schools.
But Mark, when was education ever Labour's priority? They would have scrapped Comprehensives and reintroduced Grammar Schools if they had wanted results.
Spending is only a priority for keeping union brothers and sisters off unemployment benefits!
Post a Comment