Why was Muktar Said Ibrahim, 29, recently jailed for life for the 21/7 bomb plot given a British Passport in September 2004, "despite having a lengthy criminal record for robbery and violence"?
How was he expected to contribute to the UK's economy apart from supporting the security industries!?!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
It really is unbeleivable that so many useless and criminal people like this are admitted and even given citizenship. We are stuck with our own human rubbish, we do not have a duty to take to take in other countries'. As far as it is possible to check, migrants intending permanent settlement should NEVER be criminals, NEVER be anything other than high earners, NEVER be non English speakers and NEVER be hostile to our way of life.
But Xoggoth, we're supposed to be a sanctuary for the world's jetsom...
If you actually knew how many deadbeats like this get British passports you would probably do like me and emigrate. We have handed out hundreds of thousands of British passports to wasters and people who hate us. One of the principal reasons was to disguise the asylum figures. In my view asylum seekers should never be given British passports. The genuine ones (the 1% probably) should be allowed to stay. The rest should be booted back as soon as the conditions are right. Why is it for example we have hundreds of thousands of "asylum seekers" who were "persecuted by the Taliban, Saddam" etc. and they are still here? Probably with British passports.
The conspiracy theorists above are wrong: he was given a passport because the people in charge of administering citizenship were not made aware of his criminal record. Yes, that's appallingly stupid, but it's not a sign of policy or anything else.
John B
Post a Comment