If reforms costing £540m have failed to improve the CSA, and in some aspects even worsened it (!), on what basis does the Government think that spending another £560m will improve the CSA by 2010?
Is it the same logic that suggests spending just another £x bn will reduce poverty in Africa?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
No. It is the lottery logic. Let's try again and this time we will do it differently. And they do. The results however end up the same though.
Post a Comment