Gorse Fox suggests they are: 1) Not being led by Tony Blair 2) Not beingled by John Prescott when Tony is off on a jolly 3) Not being Gordon Brown 4) Not having a Foreign Secretary that doesn't have a clue. 5) Not have a procession of Home Secretaries that haven't a clue. 6) Not stealing people's pensions (hopefully)
At least that's a good start. Any further policies would be a bonus.
Gorse Fox, I'd prefer it if people supported the Conservative Party for who they are and what they represent rather than a straightforward "anyone but Labour scenario"!
Well, if people realised what Cameron's Conservatives policies are, I doubt they'd support him – higher taxes, more integration with the European Union, more bureaucracy, more interference from government; in essence, an "heir to Blair" government. This means it can only be because people don't realise what Cameron stands for, and therefore it's an "anything but Labour" vote.
Gorse Fox suggests they are:
ReplyDelete1) Not being led by Tony Blair
2) Not beingled by John Prescott when Tony is off on a jolly
3) Not being Gordon Brown
4) Not having a Foreign Secretary that doesn't have a clue.
5) Not have a procession of Home Secretaries that haven't a clue.
6) Not stealing people's pensions (hopefully)
At least that's a good start. Any further policies would be a bonus.
Gorse Fox, I'd prefer it if people supported the Conservative Party for who they are and what they represent rather than a straightforward "anyone but Labour scenario"!
ReplyDeleteWell, if people realised what Cameron's Conservatives policies are, I doubt they'd support him – higher taxes, more integration with the European Union, more bureaucracy, more interference from government; in essence, an "heir to Blair" government. This means it can only be because people don't realise what Cameron stands for, and therefore it's an "anything but Labour" vote.
ReplyDelete